Building Talent Systems That Stick: From Theory to Practice in Workforce Strategy
- damienhwright
- Sep 17
- 3 min read
Most organisations say people are their biggest asset. Fewer invest in the systems that let that asset grow, adapt, and deliver over time. That gap between rhetoric and reality is where talent strategy either succeeds or fails. In my work — from pharma giants to food manufacturers, from global advisory to public sector — I’ve learned that no talent strategy survives contact with real life unless it’s practical, evidence-based, and manager-led.
That sounds obvious. But many organisations still confuse a glossy slide deck with a working system. They commission diagnostics, run engagement surveys, and even restructure their HR departments. But unless their operating model, workforce data, and leadership behaviours are aligned, the result is just activity — not progress.
I’ve seen the difference a real, embedded talent system can make. One of the most rewarding examples came during a transformation programme at Cadbury Trebor Bassett, where we were tasked with reducing time-to-hire for critical roles. The original cycle was 16 weeks. That’s four months of productivity lost — and high-potential candidates walking away.
We didn’t solve it with software. We solved it by getting under the skin of the business: understanding line manager pain points, mapping process bottlenecks, reviewing historical data, and co-designing interventions that made sense to real people under real pressure. Within nine months, time-to-hire was down to seven weeks. That wasn’t just a metric win — it was a culture shift. Managers were re-engaged. Candidates were better matched. And HR regained credibility as a partner, not just a process owner.
From Frameworks to Flow
I’ve written national CIPD guidance on workforce planning and succession. It’s the most downloaded guidance in the institute’s history. But I’ll be the first to say: good guidance is just the start. The hard part is turning that theory into something that lives inside an organisation — not as a policy, but as a habit.
That means aligning your talent architecture to your operating model. It means understanding how the business makes money, serves customers, and plans for growth — and then designing people systems that support that, not run parallel to it.

Take graduate recruitment. When I worked on schemes for Pfizer and Aramark, it wasn’t enough to design assessment centres and psychometrics. We had to ensure that line managers understood the strategic value of early talent, that onboarding was meaningful, and that performance conversations happened early and often. Otherwise, you’re just pouring great candidates into a leaky funnel.
The same applies to succession planning. You can build beautiful 9-box grids and heat maps. But if you haven’t built manager capability, trust in the process, and a feedback culture, it won’t stick. It’ll be a once-a-year HR ritual that everyone forgets by next quarter.
Why the MDIS Model Works
This is why the MDIS approach feels so natural to me. As an Associate, I’m not there to advise from the sidelines. I embed directly inside the client environment — translating strategy into delivery, and frameworks into systems that people actually use.
One client once said, “You don’t feel like a consultant. You feel like part of the team, but with an external lens.” I take that as a compliment. It reflects the value of being close enough to the day-to-day to drive change, but detached enough to see where the root causes lie.
The interim model gives clients flexibility and focus. They get practitioner-level expertise without the long lead times or overhead of a traditional consultancy. And they get solutions built from lived experience, not borrowed theory.
Putting People First, Always
At the heart of my approach is a simple truth: all talent systems are people systems. You can’t optimise them without understanding how people think, feel, and respond to change.
That means designing with empathy, not just efficiency. Gathering past and present workforce data, yes — but also listening to the voice of the employee. Understanding how the people strategy serves not just business outcomes, but wider stakeholder value. In a world of ESG metrics and purpose-led growth, that matters more than ever.
The best talent strategies are not top-down. They’re co-created. They’re lived. And they evolve as the business does. Whether I’m designing an L&D framework, refreshing an EVP, or helping a board assess its future leadership pipeline, I keep one question in mind: Will this still work in two years, under pressure, without me in the room?
If the answer’s yes, then we’re doing something that sticks.
About Ally Weeks
Ally Weeks is a senior HR transformation specialist, CIPD author, and talent strategy expert. With more than 25 years’ experience across pharma, FMCG, advisory, and public sector, she has helped build workforce systems that are practical, evidence-based, and manager-led. Her work spans early talent, workforce planning, and culture change — with a focus on embedded solutions that last.
Based in the UK, Ally is part of the MagicDust Interim Solutions (MDIS) Associate network, through which she delivers hands-on transformation alongside her wider advisory portfolio.


Comments